Follow
Natasha Merat
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle
N Merat, AH Jamson, FCH Lai, M Daly, OMJ Carsten
Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 27, 274-282, 2014
7602014
Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state
N Merat, AH Jamson, FCH Lai, O Carsten
Human factors 54 (5), 762-771, 2012
4862012
What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems
R Madigan, T Louw, M Wilbrink, A Schieben, N Merat
Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 50, 55-64, 2017
4562017
Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions
AH Jamson, N Merat, OMJ Carsten, FCH Lai
Transportation research part C: emerging technologies 30, 116-125, 2013
4232013
Control task substitution in semiautomated driving: Does it matter what aspects are automated?
O Carsten, FCH Lai, Y Barnard, AH Jamson, N Merat
Human factors 54 (5), 747-761, 2012
4162012
Acceptance of automated road transport systems (ARTS): an adaptation of the UTAUT model
R Madigan, T Louw, M Dziennus, T Graindorge, E Ortega, M Graindorge, ...
Transportation Research Procedia 14, 2217-2226, 2016
3752016
A human factors perspective on automated driving
M Kyriakidis, JCF de Winter, N Stanton, T Bellet, B van Arem, K Brookhuis, ...
Theoretical issues in ergonomics science 20 (3), 223-249, 2019
3492019
Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour: Effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated rural driving
AH Jamson, N Merat
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 8 (2), 79-96, 2005
3062005
User acceptance of automated shuttles in Berlin-Schöneberg: A questionnaire study
S Nordhoff, J de Winter, R Madigan, N Merat, B van Arem, R Happee
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 58, 843-854, 2018
2472018
The “Out-of-the-Loop” concept in automated driving: proposed definition, measures and implications
N Merat, B Seppelt, T Louw, J Engström, JD Lee, E Johansson, CA Green, ...
Cognition, Technology & Work 21, 87-98, 2019
2402019
Effects of cognitive load on driving performance: The cognitive control hypothesis
J Engström, G Markkula, T Victor, N Merat
Human factors 59 (5), 734-764, 2017
2352017
Designing the interaction of automated vehicles with other traffic participants: design considerations based on human needs and expectations
A Schieben, M Wilbrink, C Kettwich, R Madigan, T Louw, N Merat
Cognition, Technology & Work 21, 69-85, 2019
2172019
The interaction between driving and in-vehicle information systems: Comparison of results from laboratory, simulator and real-world studies
J Santos, N Merat, S Mouta, K Brookhuis, D De Waard
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 8 (2), 135-146, 2005
2162005
What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space?
N Merat, T Louw, R Madigan, M Wilbrink, A Schieben
Accident Analysis & Prevention 118, 244-252, 2018
2032018
Are you in the loop? Using gaze dispersion to understand driver visual attention during vehicle automation
T Louw, N Merat
Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 76, 35-50, 2017
2002017
Using the UTAUT2 model to explain public acceptance of conditionally automated (L3) cars: A questionnaire study among 9,118 car drivers from eight European countries
S Nordhoff, T Louw, S Innamaa, E Lehtonen, A Beuster, G Torrao, ...
Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 74, 280-297, 2020
1772020
Preface to the special section on human factors and automation in vehicles: Designing highly automated vehicles with the driver in mind
N Merat, JD Lee
Human factors 54 (5), 681-686, 2012
1752012
Engaging with highly automated driving: To be or not to be in the loop?
TL Louw, N Merat, AH Jamson
8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment …, 2015
1562015
How do drivers behave in a highly automated car?
N Merat, AH Jamson
Driving Assessment Conference 5 (2009), 2009
1552009
Defining interactions: A conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic
G Markkula, R Madigan, D Nathanael, E Portouli, YM Lee, A Dietrich, ...
Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 21 (6), 728-752, 2020
1542020
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20