| Judge v Robot?: Artificial intelligence and judicial decision-making T Sourdin University of New South Wales Law Journal, The 41 (4), 1114-1133, 2018 | 210 | 2018 |
| Alternative dispute resolution T Sourdin Thomson Law Book Company, 2005 | 150 | 2005 |
| Online dispute resolution: theory and practice: a treatise on technology and dispute resolution MS Abdel Wahab, ME Katsh, D Rainey (No Title), 2012 | 97 | 2012 |
| Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis T Sourdin, B Li, DM McNamara Health policy and technology 9 (4), 447-453, 2020 | 76 | 2020 |
| The Smart Court-A New Pathway to Justice in China? C Shi, T Sourdin, B Li IJCA 12, 1, 2021 | 56 | 2021 |
| Supporting discretionary decision-making with information technology: a case study in the criminal sentencing jurisdiction MJJ Hall, D Calabro, T Sourdin, A Stranieri, J Zeleznikow U. Ottawa L. & Tech. J. 2, 1, 2005 | 55 | 2005 |
| Courts, mediation and COVID-19 T Sourdin, J Zeleznikow Australian Business Law Review, Forthcoming, 2020 | 54 | 2020 |
| Consumer vulnerability and complaint handling: Challenges, opportunities and dispute system design C Brennan, T Sourdin, J Williams, N Burstyner, C Gill International journal of consumer studies 41 (6), 638-646, 2017 | 39 | 2017 |
| Justice and technological Innovation T Sourdin Journal of Judicial Administration 25, 2, 2015 | 37 | 2015 |
| The psychological impact of judicial work: Australia’s first empirical research measuring judicial stress and wellbeing C Schrever, C Hulbert, T Sourdin Journal of Judicial Administration 28 (3), 141-168, 2019 | 36 | 2019 |
| Just, quick and cheap?: Civil dispute resolution and technology T Sourdin, B Li, T Burke Macquarie Law Journal 19, 17-38, 2019 | 33 | 2019 |
| Do judges need to be human? The implications of technology for responsive judging T Sourdin, R Cornes The responsive judge: international perspectives, 87-119, 2018 | 33 | 2018 |
| Justice delayed is justice denied T Sourdin, N Burstyner Victoria University Law and Justice Journal 4 (1), 46-60, 2014 | 33 | 2014 |
| Review of the adversarial system of litigation: Rethinking the federal civil litigation system Australian Law Reform Commission Australian Law Reform Commission, 1996 | 32 | 1996 |
| Review of the adversarial system of litigation: ADR, its role in federal dispute resolution Australian Law Reform Commission Australian Law Reform Commission, 1998 | 30 | 1998 |
| Five reasons why judges should conduct settlement conferences T Sourdin Monash University Law Review 37 (1), 145-170, 2011 | 25 | 2011 |
| Alternative dispute resolution and the courts T Sourdin Federation Press, 2004 | 25 | 2004 |
| Judges, technology and artificial intelligence: The artificial judge T Sourdin Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021 | 24 | 2021 |
| 21 The Promise and Reality of Online Dispute Resolution in Australia T Sourdin, C Liyanage | 20 | 2012 |
| Review of the adversarial system of litigation: Rethinking the federal civil litigation system Australian Law Reform Commission Australian Law Reform Commission, 1996 | 19 | 1996 |
John ZeleznikowProfessor of Law and Technology, La Trobe UniversityVerified email at latrobe.edu.au
