QALYs without bias? Nonparametric correction of time trade‐off and standard gamble weights based on prospect theory SA Lipman, WBF Brouwer, AE Attema Health Economics 28 (7), 843-854, 2019 | 30 | 2019 |
Time for tele-TTO? Lessons learned from digital interviewer-assisted time trade-off data collection SA Lipman The patient-patient-centered outcomes research 14 (5), 459-469, 2021 | 28 | 2021 |
Think of the children: a discussion of the rationale for and implications of the perspective used for EQ-5D-Y health state valuation SA Lipman, VT Reckers-Droog, S Kreimeier Value in Health 24 (7), 976-982, 2021 | 27 | 2021 |
Why do adults value EQ-5D-Y-3L health states differently for themselves than for children and adolescents: a think-aloud study V Reckers-Droog, M Karimi, S Lipman, J Verstraete Value in Health 25 (7), 1174-1184, 2022 | 23 | 2022 |
Self vs. other, child vs. adult. An experimental comparison of valuation perspectives for valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health states SA Lipman, VT Reckers-Droog, M Karimi, M Jakubczyk, AE Attema The European Journal of Health Economics 22, 1507-1518, 2021 | 23 | 2021 |
The corrective approach: policy implications of recent developments in QALY measurement based on prospect theory SA Lipman, WBF Brouwer, AE Attema Value in Health 22 (7), 816-821, 2019 | 16 | 2019 |
What is it going to be, TTO or SG? A direct test of the validity of health state valuation SA Lipman, WBF Brouwer, AE Attema Health economics 29 (11), 1475-1481, 2020 | 15 | 2020 |
Living up to expectations: experimental tests of subjective life expectancy as reference point in time trade-off and standard gamble SA Lipman, WBF Brouwer, AE Attema Journal of Health Economics 71, 102318, 2020 | 14 | 2020 |
A QALY loss is a QALY loss is a QALY loss: a note on independence of loss aversion from health states SA Lipman, WBF Brouwer, AE Attema The European Journal of Health Economics 20, 419-426, 2019 | 14 | 2019 |
Self-reported prevalence of pests in Dutch households and the use of the health belief model to explore householdersĒ intentions to engage in pest control SA Lipman, SA Burt Plos One 12 (12), e0190399, 2017 | 14 | 2017 |
A value set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in the Netherlands B Roudijk, A Sajjad, B Essers, S Lipman, P Stalmeier, AP Finch Pharmacoeconomics 40 (Suppl 2), 193-203, 2022 | 13 | 2022 |
Decreasing impatience for health outcomes and its relation with healthy behavior AE Attema, SA Lipman Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics 4, 16, 2018 | 12 | 2018 |
Time and lexicographic preferences in the valuation of EQ-5D-Y with time trade-off methodology SA Lipman, L Zhang, KK Shah, AE Attema The European Journal of Health Economics 24 (2), 293-305, 2023 | 9 | 2023 |
Taking the shortcut: simplifying heuristics in discrete choice experiments J Veldwijk, SM Marceta, JD Swait, SA Lipman, EW de Bekker-Grob The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 16 (4), 301-315, 2023 | 7 | 2023 |
In a childĒs shoes: composite time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-Y-3L with different proxy perspectives SA Lipman, BAB Essers, AP Finch, A Sajjad, PFM Stalmeier, B Roudijk Pharmacoeconomics 40 (Suppl 2), 181-192, 2022 | 7 | 2022 |
QALYs without bias SA Lipman, W Brouwer, AE Attema Nonparametric correction of time trade-off and standard gamble weights based …, 2017 | 7 | 2017 |
One size fits all? Designing financial incentives tailored to individual economic preferences SA LIPMAN Behavioural Public Policy, 1-15, 2020 | 6 | 2020 |
A comparison of individual and collective decision making for standard gamble and time trade-off AE Attema, H Bleichrodt, O lĒHaridon, SA Lipman The European Journal of Health Economics 21, 465-473, 2020 | 6 | 2020 |
Modifying the composite time trade-off method to improve its discriminatory power M Jakubczyk, SA Lipman, B Roudijk, R Norman, E Pullenayegum, Y Yang, ... Value in Health 26 (2), 280-291, 2023 | 5 | 2023 |
Correcting for discounting and loss aversion in composite time trade‐off SA Lipman, AE Attema, MM Versteegh Health Economics 31 (8), 1633-1648, 2022 | 5 | 2022 |